November 15, 2000
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 11:17 PM
NYT Headline: "Judge Upholds Hand Recounts in Florida; 2 Counties are Facing New State Deadline".

The lead paragraph:

"The Florida secretary of state announced tonight that she would comply with a state judge's order to consider results of further recounts in the disputed presidential election, but she gave the two Democratic counties that are moving ahead with, or considering, a time-consuming hand recount a deadline of 2 p.m. Wednesday to explain their reasons in writing."

An excerpt from her statement:

"Unless I determine in the exercise of my discretion that these facts and circumstances contained within these written statements justify an amendment to today's official returns, the state elections canvassing commission, in a manner consistent with its usual and normal practice, will certify statewide results reported to this office today. Subsequently, the overseas ballots that are due by midnight Friday will also be certified and the final results of the election for president of the United States of America in the state of Florida will be announced."

The election "system" got more coverage on page 3:

"If it is not quite a dirty little secret, it is at least a rarely considered component of American politics: from local canvassing boards, like those in Palm Beach County, to the Federal Election Commission, people with a partisan stake can play a significant role in determining winners and losers."

The timeline of the previous day's events:

8:15 a.m. Palm Beach County suspends its hand recount of all ballots after it receives conflicting instructions over whether it can proceed.

10:25 a.m. A state court ruling on extending the 5 p.m. reporting deadline is postponed to noon.

11:25 a.m. Miami-Dade County agrees to partial hand recount requested by Gore campaign.

11:28 a.m. James A. Baker III of the Bush campaign challenges the Gore campaign to accept a 5 p.m. deadline for reporting Florida votes.

12:06 p.m. William M. Daley of the Gore campaign says the Bush offer was not fair.

12:46 p.m. State judge rules that 5 p.m. deadline should stand but that exceptions are at the discretion of the secretary of state.

1:11 p.m. Gore campaign says it will appeal decision to uphold 5 p.m. deadline.

2:00 p.m. State judge rules that 5 p.m. deadline does not apply to Broward County and gives its canvassing board the option to conduct a manual recount.

2:30 p.m. Warren Christopher of the Gore campaign says judge's decision implies that counts reported after the deadline must be considered.

3:05 p.m. Florida secretary of state's office restates expectation that it will be able to count all votes by midnight Friday.

3:17 p.m. A judge dissolves a restraining order that kept Palm Beach County from continuing its hand recount.

3:23 p.m. Miami-Dade County begins its hand recount.

4:32 p.m. Palm Beach County votes to submit its machine counted results but to continue the hand count.

4:40 p.m. Bush campaign files notice to a federal appeals court to stop all hand recounting in Florida.

The conflicting instructions Judge Burton got about the Palm Beack County recount consisted of a letter from the director of the Florida Division of Elections, saying that "an error in the vote tabulation" which would permit manual recount of ballots had to be from incorrect election parameters or software errors, and a letter from the state Attorney General, saying that the error could also include "failure of a properly functioning mechanical system to discern the choices of the voters as revealed by the ballots", and that the Division of Elections opinion was wrong.

An excerpt from the judge's ruling denying a temporary injunction against the secretary of state except for one crucial piece (accepting late returns within her discretion):

"That the secretary may ignore late-filed returns necessarily means that the secretary does not have to ignore such returns. It is, as the secretary acknowledges, within her discretion.

To determine ahead of time that such returns will be ignored, however, unless caused by some act of God, is not the exercise of discretion. It is the abdication of that discretion. ... Rather, the exercise of discretion, by its nature, contemplates a decision based upon a weighing and consideration of all attendant facts and circumstances."

On the editorial page, Kathleen Sullivan, dean of the Stanford law school, called for uniform standards for election procedures nationwide.

Well, heck, hell *did* just freeze over. Maybe it'll happen after this year. But I'm not holding my breath.


[ add comment ] §
All Bets Are Off
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 09:07 PM
I was going to write something today about the provisional ballot mess. but that wil lhave to wait until tomorrow because hell just froze over.

And for those who care, I am a Yankees fan. Expletive deleted!

[ add comment ] §
November 14, 2004
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 02:06 PM
NYT headline: "A Vote Deadline in Florida is Set for Today".

What happened? Florida's Sec. of State said she would enforce a legal Tuesday evening deadline for certifying the statewide vote. In the meantime, a federal judge in Miami refused to block the hand recounts.

In state court, the Gore campaign and two counties fought to get the Tuesday deadline extended but the judge did not immediately rule on the matter.

As we all recall, Katherine Harris, the Secretary of State in question, was also co-chair of Bush's presidential campaign in Florida. She was also a delegate at the Republican National Convention in 2000.

Unfortunately, most secretaries of state are partisans, and most play roles during election years that are as crucial as hers was.

Fox News got some spotlight shone on it as well:

"Senior executives for the Fox News Channel acknowledged last night that John Ellis, an executive who played a central role in the first decision on election night to project that George W. Bush had won the presidency, and who is a first cousin of Mr. Bush, spent much of the night in communication with the candidate.

The Fox executives said they had been unaware of the contact and said Mr. Ellis had misused his role with the network, perhaps damaging its reputation."

Here's the popular vote as it looked that day: Al Gore, 49,260,111, and George W. Bush, 49,043,820. Gore lead by 216,291 votes. The elctoral vote count was: Al Gore, 255, George W. Bush, 246, and undecided, 37 (Florida, New Mexico, Oregon).

Here's a quote from Ms. Harris on the recounts:

"Because there are no uniform standards governing this manual recount in four heavily Democratic areas, the votes in these four selective counties are not being counted accurately or fairly. They are being counted subjectively and selectively."

How close are we to uniform standards today? Get real!

[ add comment ] §
Betting Pool now open!
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 02:05 PM
On what day will we learn who won the presidential elections of Nov. 2, 2004?

a) Nov. 2, at 11:00 pm PST
b) Nov 3, at 12 noon PST
c) Nov 28, after a Florida Supreme Court decision
d) Dec 13, when an elector defects during the electoral college meeting
e) We know the final tally already (see 5-4 vote from Bush v. Gore)

My vote: Dec 16. Random? Yes. You heard it here first.


[ add comment ] §
November 13 , 2000
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 12:17 AM
NYT headline: "Recount Fight Widens as Court Case Begins".

And the subtitle: "As Bush Camp Looks to Federal Court, Gore Supporters Embrace States' Rights".

The recount itself widened too; "a divided election board in heavily Democratic Palm Beach County announced that a marathon recount, including a hand count of four sample precincts there, had produced enough discrepancies to warrant an extraordinary manual recount of all 425,000 votes cast in the county."

Volusia County workers began their own recount of 184,019 ballots, starting Nov. 12, a day behind schedule.

Sandra Guard, an election official in Seminole County, was alleged to have allowed Republican Party workers to set up shop in her office for several days and correct errors on thousands of applications for absentee ballots.

And, for an update on hanging chads: Palm Beach used the following standard to decide which chads counted and which didn't. If it was a "hanging chad" (one cornet attached to the ballot), a "swinging chad" (two corners attached), or a "tri-chad" (three corners attached), it would be counted, but if if was a "pregnant chad" (rectangle is punched or dimpled but all corners are attached), it would not be counted.

Problems with the ballots (besides the notorious butterfly ballot) started surfacing today in the news. From Fort Lauderdale:

"A funny thing happened at the polls here and in many other sites in Broward County last week. After waiting in long lines caused by heavy turnout, thousands of people stepped into the voting booths and then, if the results are to be believed, did not vote for president."

Total number of ballots: 558,007. Total ballots with no vote for president counted: 6,686.

Many people voted for Buchanan because of the poor design of the butterfly ballot. We don't have good stats on how many people punched the wrong chad, but "some county officials had heard that voters who made mistakes and asked for a second ballot were being denied them. Under Florida law they are entitled to even a third one if they mess up on the first two."


[ add comment ] §

Back Next