November 16, 2000
Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:49 AM
NYT Headline: "Florida Says No to Further Recounts as Bush Dismisses Overture From Gore".

Here's an excerpt from Katherine Harris's statement given the night before:

"After Judge Lewis's decision yesterday morning, my staff and I, along with counsel, developed criteria appropriate to the exercise of my discretion under Florida law. This criteria is clearly set forth in Florida case law.

For the past six hours, I have applied these criteria in deliberating upon the specific requests of the counties contemplating manual vote recounts. As a result of these deliberations, I've decided it is my duty under Florida law to exercise my discretion in denying these requested amendments. The reasons given in their requests are insufficient to warrant waiver of the unambiguous filing deadline imposd by the Florida Legislature."

In Palm Beach County, the recount was halted for the fourth day in a row while the board members waited for a ruling from the state Supreme Court on whether or not the manual recount was legally authorized.

In the courts, we had the following:

"In a unanimous one-page ruling late today, the Florida Supreme Court denied a request from the state's secretary of state, Katherine Harris, to block [the hand recounts]."

Also, "a federal appeals court in Atlanta agreed to hear Mr. Bush's request for an injunction to block any further recounts as unconstitutional, paving the way for possible review by the United States Supreme Court."

Gore proposed that the two campaigns accept either the results of the two manual recounts in progress, plus the overseas ballots yet to be counted, or to have a full recount of all 67 counties in Florida and abide by that. The Bush camp swiftly rejected the proposal.

Statisticians predicted that the overseas ballots would favor Bush by about 55% to Gore's 43%.

And meanwhile, back on Capitol Hill...

"Representative Tom DeLay, the Republican leader who drove the House forward to impeachment, has sent a staff memorandum to Congressional Republicans pointing out that the House and Senate can reject a state's electoral votes if they decide that the votes are tainted."

Bush and Gore both gave televised statements, a quote from each on the front page below a corresponding mug shot. Bush's quote:

"Manual counting, with individuals making subjective decisions about voter intent, introduces human error and politics into the vote-counting process."

Yeah, but as any computer tech person knows, leaving it to the computers is a guaranteed recipe for error. I *still* can't believe that some of these e-voting systems run on .... Windoze. Come on, I mean, throw me a friggin' bone here!


[ add comment ] §
To write in or not to write in... in Pennsylvania
Friday, October 22, 2004, 11:48 AM
This story broke about a week ago but it's finally starting to surface in the mainstream press.

Suppose you wanted to learn how to write in your candidate for President in Pennsylvania, someone whose name wasn't already on the ballot.

You might go look at the Pennsylvania Department of State explanation of how to do it.

Or you might go look at the League of Women Voters page describing how to write in your candidate.

Or you might google the news reports. A fine choice. Because, as it turns out, no voter guide describes the correct method, which involves writing in the names of all of the electors which in Pennsylvania means 21 names, all of which must be spelled correctly.

Of course the precise procedures, as well as the amount of room you have to write in these 21 names, varies from county to county, because the voting methods differ as well. A quite disturbing map on the official Pennsylvania voter information web site shows the patchwork of systems available.

Now, multiply this patchwork by 50, and you can see why our problem is not that we might have a repeat of Florida this year. It's that we'll wake up on Nov. 3rd to find that we are facing six Floridas.

[ add comment ] §
November 15, 2000
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 11:17 PM
NYT Headline: "Judge Upholds Hand Recounts in Florida; 2 Counties are Facing New State Deadline".

The lead paragraph:

"The Florida secretary of state announced tonight that she would comply with a state judge's order to consider results of further recounts in the disputed presidential election, but she gave the two Democratic counties that are moving ahead with, or considering, a time-consuming hand recount a deadline of 2 p.m. Wednesday to explain their reasons in writing."

An excerpt from her statement:

"Unless I determine in the exercise of my discretion that these facts and circumstances contained within these written statements justify an amendment to today's official returns, the state elections canvassing commission, in a manner consistent with its usual and normal practice, will certify statewide results reported to this office today. Subsequently, the overseas ballots that are due by midnight Friday will also be certified and the final results of the election for president of the United States of America in the state of Florida will be announced."

The election "system" got more coverage on page 3:

"If it is not quite a dirty little secret, it is at least a rarely considered component of American politics: from local canvassing boards, like those in Palm Beach County, to the Federal Election Commission, people with a partisan stake can play a significant role in determining winners and losers."

The timeline of the previous day's events:

8:15 a.m. Palm Beach County suspends its hand recount of all ballots after it receives conflicting instructions over whether it can proceed.

10:25 a.m. A state court ruling on extending the 5 p.m. reporting deadline is postponed to noon.

11:25 a.m. Miami-Dade County agrees to partial hand recount requested by Gore campaign.

11:28 a.m. James A. Baker III of the Bush campaign challenges the Gore campaign to accept a 5 p.m. deadline for reporting Florida votes.

12:06 p.m. William M. Daley of the Gore campaign says the Bush offer was not fair.

12:46 p.m. State judge rules that 5 p.m. deadline should stand but that exceptions are at the discretion of the secretary of state.

1:11 p.m. Gore campaign says it will appeal decision to uphold 5 p.m. deadline.

2:00 p.m. State judge rules that 5 p.m. deadline does not apply to Broward County and gives its canvassing board the option to conduct a manual recount.

2:30 p.m. Warren Christopher of the Gore campaign says judge's decision implies that counts reported after the deadline must be considered.

3:05 p.m. Florida secretary of state's office restates expectation that it will be able to count all votes by midnight Friday.

3:17 p.m. A judge dissolves a restraining order that kept Palm Beach County from continuing its hand recount.

3:23 p.m. Miami-Dade County begins its hand recount.

4:32 p.m. Palm Beach County votes to submit its machine counted results but to continue the hand count.

4:40 p.m. Bush campaign files notice to a federal appeals court to stop all hand recounting in Florida.

The conflicting instructions Judge Burton got about the Palm Beack County recount consisted of a letter from the director of the Florida Division of Elections, saying that "an error in the vote tabulation" which would permit manual recount of ballots had to be from incorrect election parameters or software errors, and a letter from the state Attorney General, saying that the error could also include "failure of a properly functioning mechanical system to discern the choices of the voters as revealed by the ballots", and that the Division of Elections opinion was wrong.

An excerpt from the judge's ruling denying a temporary injunction against the secretary of state except for one crucial piece (accepting late returns within her discretion):

"That the secretary may ignore late-filed returns necessarily means that the secretary does not have to ignore such returns. It is, as the secretary acknowledges, within her discretion.

To determine ahead of time that such returns will be ignored, however, unless caused by some act of God, is not the exercise of discretion. It is the abdication of that discretion. ... Rather, the exercise of discretion, by its nature, contemplates a decision based upon a weighing and consideration of all attendant facts and circumstances."

On the editorial page, Kathleen Sullivan, dean of the Stanford law school, called for uniform standards for election procedures nationwide.

Well, heck, hell *did* just freeze over. Maybe it'll happen after this year. But I'm not holding my breath.


[ add comment ] §
All Bets Are Off
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 09:07 PM
I was going to write something today about the provisional ballot mess. but that wil lhave to wait until tomorrow because hell just froze over.

And for those who care, I am a Yankees fan. Expletive deleted!

[ add comment ] §
November 14, 2004
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 02:06 PM
NYT headline: "A Vote Deadline in Florida is Set for Today".

What happened? Florida's Sec. of State said she would enforce a legal Tuesday evening deadline for certifying the statewide vote. In the meantime, a federal judge in Miami refused to block the hand recounts.

In state court, the Gore campaign and two counties fought to get the Tuesday deadline extended but the judge did not immediately rule on the matter.

As we all recall, Katherine Harris, the Secretary of State in question, was also co-chair of Bush's presidential campaign in Florida. She was also a delegate at the Republican National Convention in 2000.

Unfortunately, most secretaries of state are partisans, and most play roles during election years that are as crucial as hers was.

Fox News got some spotlight shone on it as well:

"Senior executives for the Fox News Channel acknowledged last night that John Ellis, an executive who played a central role in the first decision on election night to project that George W. Bush had won the presidency, and who is a first cousin of Mr. Bush, spent much of the night in communication with the candidate.

The Fox executives said they had been unaware of the contact and said Mr. Ellis had misused his role with the network, perhaps damaging its reputation."

Here's the popular vote as it looked that day: Al Gore, 49,260,111, and George W. Bush, 49,043,820. Gore lead by 216,291 votes. The elctoral vote count was: Al Gore, 255, George W. Bush, 246, and undecided, 37 (Florida, New Mexico, Oregon).

Here's a quote from Ms. Harris on the recounts:

"Because there are no uniform standards governing this manual recount in four heavily Democratic areas, the votes in these four selective counties are not being counted accurately or fairly. They are being counted subjectively and selectively."

How close are we to uniform standards today? Get real!

[ add comment ] §

Back Next